Calling Jennings a "czar" is an interesting word choice that feels a little like McCarthy-type accusations of communism. And Jennings isn't the only one the paper calls a "czar." Here are a few others, taken directly from the editorial:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0e0e/f0e0e8fbabd5dcdb55ecad96f392e0d4ea148861" alt=""
1. Carol Browner, Obama's energy and climate czar, (left) was a major player with a socialist group that advocated " 'global governance' and says rich countries must shrink their economies to address climate change."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48e96/48e96893f5c83c59bbce2814a52f09167dba17c3" alt=""
2. Science czar John Holdren (right) co-authored a textbook in the 1970s that floated the ideas of forced abortion and mass sterilization.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe535/fe535d2e11fad33de929dc5f35aeb0b53f8c7e64" alt=""
And on and on. I doubt that even Mother Teresa would get a pass with the right wing media, as long as President Obama named her to a post. (I can read it now: You think she was just feeding the poor? The non-American born Mother Teresa, now the Anti-Poverty Czar, has a long history of communist tactics to redistribute wealth in India.)
Thanks to The Advocate for running the story that led me to the editorial.
The shrillness of these attacks are the very reason why they don't have any credibility except for those who already have an anti-Obama bias.
ReplyDeleteIt's totally ridiculous but they will try to keep it up to fire up the troops so to speak.